Legal Opinion
Gatto v. Curtis
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 26, 1972No. 54730PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDBERG
deivered the opinion of the court:
A long and complicated record brings before this court the appeal of Calumet Flexicore Corporation (Calumet). The action was brought by Sophie Gatto for personal injuries and also by her husband, Frank Gatto, for loss of consortium. The third plaintiff is their granddaughter, Janice Roger, then a minor, who sued for personal injuries. These persons will be collectively referred to as plaintiffs. The cause of action arose on June 19, 1964. Sophie Gatto and Janice Boger were customers in a drug store when a portion of the roof…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Moore v. Jewel Tea Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Finley v. New York Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Moore v. Jewel Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gatto v. Walgreen Drug Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Harkins v. IkedaHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Friedman v. Park District of Highland ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Smith v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- State v. SteeleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.