Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAHN, District Judge.
In this dispute over the extent to which the defendant owes the plaintiffs pension benefits, the parties have filed extensive pre-trial and post-trial briefs, stipulations of facts, and exhibits. After a non-jury trial, I make the following:
I.FINDINGS OF FACT 1
A. The Parties
1. The representative plaintiffs are:
a. Edwin Kotrosits, a resident of Co-play, Pennsylvania for more than 30 years. S.l.
b. Julius Ruggeri, a resident of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania for more than 30 years. S.19.
c. Marvyn Souders, a resident of Ore-field, Pennsylvania for more than 30 years. S.29.
2.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nazay v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Nazay v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Zazzali v. Hirschler Fleischer, P.C.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Bass v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.