Legal Opinion

Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1991No. Civ. A. 88-1835PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAHN, District Judge.

In this dispute over the extent to which the defendant owes the plaintiffs pension benefits, the parties have filed extensive pre-trial and post-trial briefs, stipulations of facts, and exhibits. After a non-jury trial, I make the following:

I.FINDINGS OF FACT 1

A. The Parties

1. The representative plaintiffs are:

a. Edwin Kotrosits, a resident of Co-play, Pennsylvania for more than 30 years. S.l.

b. Julius Ruggeri, a resident of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania for more than 30 years. S.19.

c. Marvyn Souders, a resident of Ore-field, Pennsylvania for more than 30 years. S.29.

2.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nazay v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Nazay v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Zazzali v. Hirschler Fleischer, P.C.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  5. Bass v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API