Legal Opinion
Brignull v. Albert
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 17, 1995PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
Paul Abert appeals from a judgment entered after a nonjury trial in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Atwood, J.) awarding damages of $30,000 to Roger Brignull for Abert’s breach of a noncompetition agreement. Abert argues that the trial court erred in enforcing the agreement and that the damages awarded are not supported by the evidence and are punitive in nature. We affirm the judgment.
Roger Brignull is an optometrist with offices in Bar Harbor and Ellsworth. In 1985 he hired Paul Abert as an associate. The parties signed a series of one-year employment contracts that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ferrofluidics Corporation v. Advanced Vacuum Components, inc.s.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Smith, Batchelder & Rugg v. FosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Ferrofluidics Corp. v. Advanced Vacuum Components, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Chapman & Drake v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Pacheco v. ScoblionkoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bernier v. Merrill Air EngineersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Everett J. Prescott, Inc. v. RossDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. HornerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED v. County Qwick Print, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
- Raisin Memorial Trust v. CaseySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.