Legal Opinion

Will v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

It is conceded that plaintiff’s employment at the time of the injury was connected with interstate *251commerce and that therefore the respective rights and liabilities of the parties are under the federal- statutes and not those of this state.

It is conceded in this case that there was danger for anyone to enter the confined space of one of these bunkers, a charcoal fire burning and gas being present, until after some six to eight minutes had been allowed for such gas to pass off by the opening of the top of tire bunker; that the going out of a lowered light in such bunker was a danger signal and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bentson v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dick v. HeislerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Papke v. HaerleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kosak v. BoyceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Stevens v. Montfort State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Waters v. MarkhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Biersach v. WechselbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Nelson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Christensen v. SchwartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. United Farm Workers of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API