Superior California Fruit Land Co. v. Grossman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. H. M. Albery, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
PLUMMER, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs instituted this action to remove a cloud therefrom and quiet their title to a tract of land, embracing 6,173 acres, situate in the county of Colusa. The defendants, by answer and cross-complaint, sought specific performance of a certain option or agreement of sale relating to the same premises. Plaintiffs had judgment and decree of the trial court, as prayed for, from which judgment and decree defendants appeal, the merits of which may be determined by the solution of two questions:
First: Was the trial court right in holding that the plaintiffs were entitled to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Green v. CovillaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Troll v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Herzog v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R.R.California Supreme Court · 1908
- O'Sullivan v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Marsh v. LottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Arnold v. Universal Oil Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- King v. Los Angeles County Fair Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Clanton v. ClantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Warfield v. Anglo & London Paris National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.