Diprizio v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF BD. OF REV.

ELLETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Vito Diprizio, seeks reversal of a decision of the Industrial Commission,1 which denied his application for further unemployment benefits and required him to repay $1,217 which it found he had been paid without being entitled thereto, in that the Commission found that the plaintiff had knowingly withheld “material facts of his work and earnings to receive benefits to which he was not entitled,” in violation of 35-4-5(e), U.C.A.1953. He argues: (1) that the evidence does not justify a finding that he “knowingly” violated the statute; and (2) that the imposition…