Legal Opinion

Smith v. Department of Workforce Services

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 23, 2010No. 20100014-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOROS, Judge:

{1 Petitioner Kristy Smith challenges a decision of the Workforce Appeals Board (the Board) assessing repayment and a statutory penalty against her for unlawfully obtaining unemployment benefits. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

1 2 Smith was separated from JetBlue Airways on December 31, 2008, as part of a reduction in force. At that time, JetBlue gave Smith a lump sum payment of $18,960.74 for her years of service and for unused vacation pay. On January 3, 2009, Smith opened a claim for unemployment benefits by telephone. An automated system asked if she had received or was entitled…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Drake v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Workforce Appeals Board, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. Foye v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. Macfarlane v. CSROCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. Blair v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Certified Building Maintenance v. Labor Commission, Appeals Board of the Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API