Christensen v. Board of Rev. of Indus. Com'n

I concur in the result. But in doing so add some comments.

There is a reasonable basis in the evidence to support the Commission’s finding that the plaintiff was not available for work, during a week in which he applied for and accepted compensation, under a representation that he was available for work. According to the standard rules of review, that finding is not subject to reversal by this Court. There is therefore no doubt that the $88 should be refunded.

Concerning the disqualification for 52 weeks, I view the matter somewhat differently. I conceive it to be my duty to recognize that the…