Legal Opinion

Mineér v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1977No. 14696 and 14728PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

This is a review of two cases involving identical issues. The Industrial Commission found that both plaintiffs violated U.C.A. 1953, 35-4-5(e), by knowingly failing to report work and earnings during times they claimed to be unemployed and without earnings. Pursuant to said statute the commission assessed a 52-week disqualification period against them and required the repayment of benefits of $1,640 and $1,674 respectively paid to them.

Plaintiffs challenge the findings of the commission, asserting that 1) they are not supported by the evidence, 2) that the 52-week…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. In Re the Habeas Corpus of LutkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Diprizio v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF BD. OF REV.Utah Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  2. Taylor v. Department of Employment Security, Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Martinez v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Whitney v. BOARD OF REV. OF INDUS. COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kearl v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API