Mineér v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Justice:
This is a review of two cases involving identical issues. The Industrial Commission found that both plaintiffs violated U.C.A. 1953, 35-4-5(e), by knowingly failing to report work and earnings during times they claimed to be unemployed and without earnings. Pursuant to said statute the commission assessed a 52-week disqualification period against them and required the repayment of benefits of $1,640 and $1,674 respectively paid to them.
Plaintiffs challenge the findings of the commission, asserting that 1) they are not supported by the evidence, 2) that the 52-week…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re the Habeas Corpus of LutkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Diprizio v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF BD. OF REV.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- Taylor v. Department of Employment Security, Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Martinez v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Whitney v. BOARD OF REV. OF INDUS. COM'N OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Kearl v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.