Legal Opinion

Cox v. Cronan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 25, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the nature of debt on judgment, brought to the City Court of New Haven and tried to the jury before Tyner, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The judgment sued upon in this action was rendered on February 26th, 1903, in favor of Sussman Goldreyer against this defendant. In April following, and while an appeal from that judgment by the defendant was pending, one Mersick brought suit against Goldreyer and ■ factorized the defendant as his debtor. That suit was pending until October 7th, 1907, when it was withdrawn. The plaintiff in the present action claimed in the trial court, and under portions of the charge to which no exception has been taken the jury must have found, that Goldreyer had assigned his judgment to the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  2. Woodruff v. BaconSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
  3. Candee v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Russell v. Fred G. Pohl Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Loewe v. Savings Bank of DanburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  3. Vidal Realtors of Westport, Inc. v. Harry Bennett & Associates., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  4. Greenwich Plumbing & Heating Co. v. A. Barbaresi & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. Caron v. Southwest Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API