Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Carey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action in the nature of interpleader to determine the rights of the respective parties in and to a judgment-debt due from the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company to the defendant Carey, and claimed by the plaintiff and several other fire insurance companies, also for an injunction, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County where, upon a cross-complaint filed by the railroad company, which was found to be true, an interlocutory order was rendered (Bor…
Read the full summary
Action in the nature of interpleader to determine the rights of the respective parties in and to a judgment-debt due from the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company to the defendant Carey, and claimed by the plaintiff and several other fire insurance companies, also for an injunction, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County where, upon a cross-complaint filed by the railroad company, which was found to be true, an interlocutory order was rendered (Bor aback, A) requiring said company to pay into court the amount of the debt, but without interest since the date of the…
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This action was commenced by complaint dated July 26th, 1905.
The defendants are Sarah Carey, Caleb A. Morse, The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, and three described insurance companies.
The complaint alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff company in June, 1904, paid to the defendant Mrs. Carey $1,500 insurance upon the loss sustained by her by the burning of her hotel building in the town of Kent on the 28th of April, 1904, from fire communicated by a locomotive of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company; that upon a suit brought to the Superior Court by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Coughlin v. McElroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Union Trust Co. v. Stamford Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Nash v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Western Maryland Dairy, Inc. v. ChenowithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Loda v. H. K. Sargeant & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Clyde Austin v. Texas-Ohio Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Vitale v. GargiuloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.