Sneeden v. . Nurnberger's Market
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
On 7 October, 1924, tbe defendant executed a written instrument by wbicb it assigned and transferred to Swift & Company all tbe accounts and cboses in action tben due it by its customers or at any time thereafter to become due, and authorized tbe assignee to collect tbe respective sums as they matured, tbe assignment being “continuing security” for tbe defendant’s present and prospective indebtedness to tbe assignee. Tbe defendant tben executed a “trust receipt” acknowledging possession of tbe assigned papers for tbe purpose of collection and remittance to Swift & Company, who at tbe same…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Moors v. ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Ball-Thrash & Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Rose v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
- Wallston v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bundy v. . Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. MayberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Bundy v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Commercial Casualty Ins. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.