Legal Opinion
Wayne Moving & Storage of New Jersey, Inc. v. School District
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 28, 2010No. 09-3890PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
This diversity action requires us to decide under Pennsylvania law whether a subcontractor may recover against a school district for a claim of unjust enrichment. The case involves a dispute over unpaid services between the subcontractor Wayne Moving & Storage of New Jersey (“Wayne Moving”) and the appellants the School District of Philadelphia and the School Reform Commission (collectively, “School District”). Wayne Moving sued the School District under a theory of unjust enrichment for unpaid moving services. The United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Startzell v. City of Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance v. SquiresCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Montgomery County v. MERSCORP, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Cohen v. SikiricaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- MRO Corp. v. Humana Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Pennsylvania v. Navient Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.