Legal Opinion
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Czizek
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 12, 1923No. 3885PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOEVERTON, District Judge.
This is the second appeal. The facts of the case are adequately set forth in the opinion rendered when it was first here, and it is unnecessary to repeat them. Under stipulation of counsel, entered at the trial in the District Court, it was agreed that the testimony taken on the former trial should be considered to have been taken in the present cause, to the same extent as though the witnesses were produced, subject, however, to all legal objections shown by the record on the former trial; and that, in addition to such testimony, the evidence should be confined to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Warren-Godwin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- National Bank of Commerce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Messinger v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- White v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CzizekSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Frank A. Calhoun v. J. W. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Coastal Club, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1944
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. NesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939