Legal Opinion
Frank A. Calhoun v. J. W. Bernard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1966No. 19900_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
This is the second appeal in this case. On the first, we remanded “for the making of further findings, either upon the evidence already received or upon such further evidence as the court may decide to hear, and for the entry of a new judgment * * (Calhoun v. Bernard, 9 Cir., 1964, 333 F.2d 739, 742). The basic facts are stated in that opinion, and we do not repeat them here.
The trial court did not receive new evidence, but it did make new findings. On this appeal, appellant has brought up the testimony. His primary contention is that the evidence does not support the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CzizekSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Frank A. Calhoun, Individually and Dba Calhoun Dry-Wall Company v. J. W. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CzizekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- Guillermo Gallego Munoz v. County of ImperialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Joseph H. Seymour, Etc. v. Coughlin Company, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Joseph L. Alioto v. Cowles Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Bethlehem Mines Corporation v. United Mine Workers of America Er Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Penn International Industries v. Pennington Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.