Messinger v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
LURTON, Circuit Judge.
This is the third writ of error in the same case. The action was ejectment to recover real estate. The plaintiff below was Peter Anderson, a grandson of Henry Anderson, and the title turned upon the proper interpretation of the will of Henry Anderson.
Upon the first trial of the case the court below ruled that under that will the plaintiff took no title, and directed a judgment for the defendant. Upon the first writ of error we adjudged that the court below had erroneously construed the will of said Anderson, and that upon a proper interpretation thereof the plaintiff…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Brown v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- E. E. Taenzer & Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- William Wrigley, Jr. Co. v. L. P. Larson, Jr. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.