Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Griner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 13, 1932No. 8919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Under the decision in Parker v. Travelers Insurance Co., 174 Ga. 525 (163 S. E. 159), the question propounded by the Court of Appeals, as set forth above, must be answered in the negative. If, as was held in that case, the insurance carrier would “not be estopped, by reason of the issuance of such policy of insurance and the acceptance of premiums thereon, including premiums based upon the salary or wages paid to such officer or official, from denying that the relation of employer and employee existed between such municipal corporation and any such officer or official,” it necessarily follows…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Atlantic Ice & Coal Corp. v. WishardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Hornburg v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Orth v. Shiely Petter Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. General Accident &c. Assurance Corp. v. John P. King Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. City Council of Augusta v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. City of Brunswick v. EdenfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Edwards v. Mayor of MilledgevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API