Legal Opinion

City Council of Augusta v. Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 2, 1935No. 23936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

I. “The existence of the relation of employer and employee, within the meaning of section 2 (b) of the workmen’s compensation act, is necessary in order to confer upon the industrial commission jurisdiction to entertain a claim for compensation in any and all cases.” Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co., 174 Ga. 525 (2) (163 S. E. 159, 81 A. L. R. 472) ; Gravitt v. Georgia Casualty Co., 158 Ga. 613, 618 (123 S. E. 897) ; Hartford Accident &c. Co. v. Thompson, 167 Ga. 897, 899 (147 S. E. 50).

2. In City of Macon v. Whittington, 171 Ga. 643 (156 S. E. 674), it was held that a member of the city fire…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gravitt v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Parker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. American Bakeries Co. v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Freeman v. BrandauCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. City of Brunswick v. EdenfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Edwards v. Mayor of MilledgevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API