Legal Opinion

State v. . Eller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Respondent’s contention that the judgment absolute is voidable and unenforceable for that the sci. fa. was not served on the principal cannot be sustained. Bond Co. v. Krider, ante, 361. Its further contention, that the fact that the principal on the bond had been arrested by officials of another county of this State and was tried and sentenced and was actually in custody of State officials at the time the case was called for trial constitutes a valid defense and that the judgment absolute was prematurely pronounced presents a more serious question.

The authorities seem to be in substantial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sedberry v. . CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. State v. . WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Adrian & Vollers v. ScanlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Granberry v. . PoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allison v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. VikreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. DewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API