State v. . Welborn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is conceded by the Attorney-General that the judgment entered on the forfeited recognizance cannot be sustained. C. S., 191.
Tbe action of tbe Federal Court and tbe defendant’s present confinement in prison prevented bim from appearing, and bis bondsmen from producing bim, at tbe April Term, Guilford Superior Court, agreeably to tbe provisions of bis recognizance. Granberry v. Tool, 14 N. C., 155; 6 C. J., 1026; 3 R. C. L., 52; Annotation, 26 A. L. R., 412. Hence, under tbe principles announced in S. v. Eure, 172 N. C., 874, 89 S. E., 788, S. v. Holt, 145 N. C., 450, 59 S. E., 64, and S. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Maultsby.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. Morgan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- State v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Sedberry v. . CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- State v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allison v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Public Service Mutual Insurance Company v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- State v. . EllerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.