Legal Opinion

State v. . Holt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 23, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ActioN against the surety upon an appearance bond, heard before Gouncill, J., at March Term, 1907, of the Superior Court of ÁNSON County. Erom judgment rendered against him the defendant appealed. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtClabK, C. J.

Sci. fa. against Holt, principal, and Ballard, surety, on appearance bond. The defendant was called on Wednesday of April Term, and judgment nisi and capias ordered. It was issued 10 July and served on surety, the principal not found, having become a fugitive from justice on another charge. On motion for judgment absolute, the surety, Ballard, answered that Holt did not appear in court on Wednesday when called, because he could not, being under arrest in the town lockup, and that as soon as released lie came to the courthouse, but found that his case had been continued. The Solicitor replied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Morgan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . EllerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. State v. . WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Dyson v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API