Legal Opinion
Melton v. Carter
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 22, 1942No. 4-6763PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.
Constitutionality of Act 94 is the issue. The measure became a law February 25,1941, without the governor’s signature.
The controversy goes back to a suit by the state to prevent Gus Blass Company from engaging in the practice of optometry. Collateral issues were involved. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Gus Blass Company, 193 Ark. 1159, 105 S. W. 2d 853. Act 27, approved February 11, 1935, was before the court. It was entitled “An Act to define and prescribe the practice of optometry; to prescribe procedure for the practice of optometry, the power of the [state board of examiners], and for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- People v. . RingeNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Gus Blass Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Schnaier v. . Navarre Hotel Importation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Reyburn v. Minnesota State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Kendall v. BeilingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.