Legal Opinion

California Crushed Fruit Corp. v. International Provision Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1932No. Docket No. 8161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action to rescind a lease and to recover damages for alleged fraud. The defendant answered and the trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiff. From the judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed.

The property involved was a stall in a public market. The plaintiff was engaged in selling soft drinks. It was alleged that the defendant falsely represented to the plaintiff: (1) That it should have the sole right to sell soft drinks in the market, and (2) that the aisles would be kept open and unobstructed so tliat all persons could freely use them and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Brown v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistristCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Zeller v. MilliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmers & Merchants' National Bank v. BailieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API