Legal Opinion

Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1992No. 1809 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

This is an appeal by Berwick Industries (Employer) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying the claim petition of Coralee A. Spaid (Claimant) on the basis that it was time barred by Section 315 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 602, but granting her request for medical expenses made pursuant to Section 306(f) of the Act, 77 P.S. § 531. 1

The relevant facts are not in dispute. The referee found that Claimant had sustained a work-related injury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Chabotar v. S. Klein Department StoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Levine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API