Legal Opinion
Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 24, 1994No. 62 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1992Published
1Opinion of the Court
537 Pa. 326 (1994)
643 A.2d 1066
BERWICK INDUSTRIES, Appellant,
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (Coralee A. SPAID), Appellees.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 18, 1993.
Decided May 24, 1994.
Frank L. Tamulonis, Jr., Pottsville, for Berwick Industries.
William Keller, Philadelphia, for C.A. Spaid.
Norman Haigh, Secretary, for W.C.A.B.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ.
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the three-year statute of repose at Section 315 of the Workmen's Compensation Act,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Schmucker v. NaugleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Consulting Engineers Council v. State Architects Licensure BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Paolis v. Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.