Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Duke

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 17, 1979No. 77 CIV 875 (LBS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment in this action for malicious prosecution, asserting that as a matter of New Jersey law, which controls here, plaintiff cannot establish the four elements necessary for such a cause of action. We conclude that as to one of the four elements, there exist no issues of material fact and plaintiff cannot prevail as a matter of law. The motion, therefore, is granted.

The elements of a malicious prosecution are as follows:(1) A criminal proceeding instituted or continued by the defendant against the plaintiff;(2) Termination of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Devlin v. GreinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Seidel v. GREENBERGNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. State v. WhittakerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Theodore Rothstein v. Mark Carriere, and Multi-Media Distributing Co. Inc., Leisure Time Entertainment, Inc., and Leisure Time Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Pera v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dirienzo v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
  4. Viza v. Town of GreeceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Babi-Ali v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API