Legal Opinion

Pera v. Kroger Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1984PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

This action was instituted by plaintiff, Gina Pera, against The Kroger Company for malicious prosecution and defamation and against Valley Fidelity Bank & Trust Company for alleged wrongful dishonor of a check. The defendants were not sued jointly but severally; separate amounts of damages were claimed against each. Join-der was permissible, however, because common questions of fact were presented.

At the conclusion of the evidence the trial judge directed a verdict for The Kroger Company as to all claims asserted against it. The jury returned a verdict against Valley…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bland v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ira v. COLUMBIA FOOD CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Brown v. DunstanTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Carney v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Malvern Brick & Tile Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Brenda Benz-Elliott v. Barrett Enterprises, LPTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Coffee v. Peterbilt of Nashville, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Spence v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1992
  5. Franklin Am. Mortg. Co. v. Univ. Nat'l Bank of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API