Legal Opinion

Town of Glastonbury v. Metro. Dist. Comm'n

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 6, 2018No. SC 19843PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

**327The defendant in this declaratory judgment action, the Metropolitan District Commission, a quasi-municipal corporation that provides potable water to eight member and five nonmember towns in the greater Hartford area, appeals1 from the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, the town of Glastonbury. The plaintiff, one of the nonmember towns, brought this action, seeking a determination by the court that, prior to 2014, the defendant unlawfully had imposed surcharges on it and the other nonmember towns. Thereafter, the trial court denied the defendant's motion to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. City of New Haven v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Safford v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Lighthouse Landings, Inc. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mendillo v. Tinley, Renehan & Dost, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. State v. FletcherConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. 777 Residential, LLC v. Metropolitan District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. State v. SchimanskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  5. Metropolitan District Commission v. QBE Americas, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API