Legal Opinion

Brannon v. State Roads Commission of the State Highway Administration

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 1986No. 95, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

In this case, we shall delineate the permissible scope of the landowner’s testimony in a condemnation proceeding where, for purposes of assessing the amount of damages caused by the partial taking, the before-taking and after-taking value of the landowner’s property is in dispute.

We summarize the facts as follows. The State filed a petition in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County to acquire one-third of an acre from Mr. and Mrs. Brannon’s six and two-third acre residential property. The State deemed it necessary to condemn this portion of the Bran-non’s property to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State Roads Commission v. WarrinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency v. Thirteen Parcels of Land in Squares 859, 912, 934 & 4068Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Bergeman v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Pumphrey v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. CumminsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Ray v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Williams v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API