Legal Opinion

Fairchild v. Cartwright

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1918No. Civ. No. 1867PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of the county of Sacramento, sitting without a jury, in favor of plaintiff and respondent for the sum of two thousand one hundred dollars, with interest from June 1,1913, at the rate of seven per cent per annum, amounting to $502.25, and for costs in the sum of $42.

Appellant specifies as causes for said appeal that the evidence adduced at said trial does not justify the said findings of fact and conclusions of law in four particulars, namely:

1.' That said alleged agreement to pay is in contravention of the statute of frauds; 2. That said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Whelan v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. StoferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrunbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Rusconi v. California Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Michael Distributing Co. v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Moran v. CopemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kressly v. District Bond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API