Fairchild v. Cartwright
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of the county of Sacramento, sitting without a jury, in favor of plaintiff and respondent for the sum of two thousand one hundred dollars, with interest from June 1,1913, at the rate of seven per cent per annum, amounting to $502.25, and for costs in the sum of $42.
Appellant specifies as causes for said appeal that the evidence adduced at said trial does not justify the said findings of fact and conclusions of law in four particulars, namely:
1.' That said alleged agreement to pay is in contravention of the statute of frauds; 2. That said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Whelan v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. StoferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weaver v. GrunbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Rusconi v. California Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Michael Distributing Co. v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Moran v. CopemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Kressly v. District Bond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.