Legal Opinion
De Long Corporation v. Joseph E. Lucas
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 11, 1960No. 26004_1PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
Our task on this appeal has been immeasurably lightened by Judge Bryan’s comprehensive opinion, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1959, 176 F.Supp. 104. Indeed, the opinion has received the highest possible tribute — a large measure of acquiescence from the parties. Defendant Lucas has not appealed from the direction that he assign to plaintiff his patent applications for a derrick barge and for a well drilling and servicing barge; and plaintiff DeLong has not appealed from the denial of its demand that Lucas assign to it his patent application for a cable jack. The sole issue on which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- De Long Corporation v. LucasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Keiser v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Myers v. Roger J. Sullivan Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Mills v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Ritani, LLC v. AghjayanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.