Legal Opinion
Myers v. Roger J. Sullivan Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1911No. Docket No. 27PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Assumpsit by Alfred J. Myers against the Roger J. Sullivan Company on a contract of employment. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
A judgment on a verdict, instructed in favor of defendant by the court, was entered in this suit, brought by plaintiff to recover a balance claimed to be due him under a written agreement between the parties. Defendant offered no evidence in the case.
The contract reads as follows:
“Agreement made this 7th day of November, 1907, between the Roger J. Sullivan Company, of Detroit, Michigan, of the first part, and Alfred J. Myers, of the same place, of the second part, witnesseth: That in consideration of the faithful performance by the second party of his agreements hereinafter set forth, said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Biest v. VerSteeg Shoe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Dieringer v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- De Long Corporation v. Joseph E. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Keiser v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Perfection Mattress & Spring Co. v. DupreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Mike Vaughn Custom Sports, Inc. v. PikuDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.