Legal Opinion
Ritani, LLC v. Aghjayan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 20, 2012No. 11 CIV. 8928PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Harout Aghjayan (“Aghjayan” or the “Defendant”), Harout R, LLC (“Harout R”), H. Ritani, Inc. (“HR Inc.”), H. Ritani, LLC (“HR LLC”), H. Ritani, Corp. (“HR Corp.”) and Amazing Settings, LLP (“Amazing Settings”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the *432complaint (the “Initial Complaint” or “IC”) of plaintiff Ritani, LLC (“Ritani” or the “Plaintiff’) alleging numerous acts of misconduct by the Defendants, including, but not limited to, copyright and trademark…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Vox Amplification Ltd. v. MeussdorfferDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Lowinger v. Morgan Stanley & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Perfect Pearl Co. v. Majestic Pearl & Stone, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Van Praagh v. GrattonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Pulse Creations, Inc. v. Vesture Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.