Legal Opinion
State v. Auger
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 3, 1963No. 283PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.
The State, by an appeal before judgment on the verdict, seeks to test the validity of the trial court’s exclusion of a blood analysis in a driving-while-intoxicated matter, instituted under the “implied consent” law. 23 V.S.A. §§1188-94.
The first challenge to the appeal is a motion in this Court to dismiss because the certification from the Caledonia Municipal Court did not set out in writing the questions of law sought to be reviewed as required by Supreme Court Rule 2A. Permission to appeal was granted by the trial court on July 27, 1962. The rule in question was not promulgated until April…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Troy v. AMERICAN FIDELTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- State v. FornierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
- State v. LumbraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- State v. RowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Filmon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- State v. CarmodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. WetherellWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.