Legal Opinion

State v. Lunsford

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 21, 1973No. 55542PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

Defendant was convicted by jury and sentenced for sale of a narcotic drug (marijuana) under § 204.2, The Code, 1966. His appeal presents three questions: (1) Did trial court err in admitting evidence as to details of an experiment? (2) Did trial court err in admitting the alleged marijuana into evidence over an objection that the State had not demonstrated a proper chain of custody? (3) Was defendant deprived of a fair trial because tried by members of a jury panel which had been-told of his former plea of guilty in the case? We answer “no” to the first two questions, “yes”…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Albert Lopez Gallego v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Hedges v. ConderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Herman C. West, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. State v. LangletSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. State v. BakkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. State v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. State v. MattinglySupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API