Legal Opinion
State v. Lumbra
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 2, 1962No. 571PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.
The respondent was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. His motion to set aside the verdict was denied by the trial court. On appeal here, three grounds, all of them pertaining to the motion to set aside, are relied upon. The first of these briefed by the respondent is as follows:
“5. That the Jury, due to to its limited deliberations, could have based its Verdict only on the result of the blood test which was unlawfully taken as prescribed in Title 23, §1190, Vermont Statutes Annotated.”
The statement that the jury “could have based its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ryan v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. DalrympleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Beach v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- O'Connell v. FordSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
- Urquhart v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Pcolar v. Casella Waste Systems and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- State v. AugerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- State v. ArbeitmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- State v. MosierNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.