Standard Varnish Works v. Haydock
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.
The Decatur Buggy Company, an Ohio corporation, on April 9, 1904, made a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors. On the 19th of that month a petition of some of its creditors was filed in the court below, praying that the company be adjudicated a bankrupt; and on May 11th following it was, upon the hearing of said petition, so adjudged. The Standard Varnish Works, the appellant here, filed and proved a claim as a general creditor against the bankrupt for goods sold to it for the purpose of its business, and upon the footing of such a creditor participated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moller v. . TuskaNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kennedy v. . ThorpNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Seavey v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Carter v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- In re HildebrantDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1903
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCullough v. Clinch-Mitchell Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Shonkweiler v. HarringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- Korns v. Thomson & McKinnonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
- Robinson v. EXCHANGE NAT. BANK OF TULSA, OKL.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1939
- Schelske v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.