Legal Opinion
Schelske v. Smith
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 1929No. File Nos. 6570, 6571PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.
This is a consolidated appeal from judgments in separate actions. It is now before us on rehearing. The first opinion is reported in 222 N. W. 941, to which reference is made for the facts. The question argued on rehearing pertains to an election of remedies, which appellants contend bars this action. The question received scant attention in our former opinion, and, not being satisfied that our position was right, a rehearing was allowed.
Plaintiffs conveyed a farm' in consideration of certain forged certificates of deposit, purporting to have been issued 'by the Security Bank of Tyndall, S.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Crook v. First National Bank of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Swan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Crossman v. Universal Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paxton v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Meredith v. RamsdellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Wang v. WangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- LBM, Inc. v. Rushmore State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Bridgmon v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.