Legal Opinion

Vail v. EMP. DIV. OF DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1977No. 76-AB-1142, CA 7400PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, P. J.

The issue presented in this unemployment compensation appeal is whether the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) erred in determining that claimant had refused to accept suitable work and was therefore disqualified from receiving benefits.

Claimant appeals from a decision of EAB reversing by a divided vote the administrator and the referee and determining that claimant was disqualified.

The essential facts are set out in EAB’s findings:

"(1) Claimant was employed by this employer as an assistant planner from April 1964 to October 1967. (2) In January 1968 he became re-employed by this employer as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henzel v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Grigsby v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Wilton v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. McCain v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Balduyck v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perfin v. ColeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Marella v. Employment Department & Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. City of Pendleton v. KernsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API