Legal Opinion
United States v. Felix Rivera Manglona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1969No. 23195_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
In the first count of a two-count indictment, Felix Rivera Manglona, Francisco Quintanilla Pangelinan and Felix San Agustín San Agustín, were charged with forging the endorsement of the payee, Jesus H. Cruz, on a $125.00 Government check. In the second count they were charged with uttering the check as true and genuine, with intent to defraud the United States. Both acts were alleged to be in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495 (1964).
Pangelinan and San Agustín pleaded guilty. Manglona pleaded not guilty. He was tried before a jury and was found guilty on the uttering count and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Langford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Robert Spencer Vastine, Jr., and Edward Joseph DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- United States v. KnightDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- United States v. Earle T. CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Robert James AndrinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Cummings v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- United States v. Alfredo Puchi, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.