Cummings v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
Myriad eases have dealt with the issue of whether Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), has been complied with. The convictions now under review — those of William Ralph Cummings by a Baltimore City jury presided over by Judge Shirley B. Jones for automobile manslaughter and related traffic offenses — deal with the somewhat rarer threshold issue of whether Miranda is applicable.
A prefatory word is in order to keep the constitutional question straight. There is not — under the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution 1 or under Article 22 of the Maryland…
2Cases cited118 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- People v. SavoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Bartram v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.