Legal Opinion

Enochs v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1896No. 17,975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Prom the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

— The circuit court sustained several demurrers to each of the two paragraphs of the appellant’s complaint, and the plaintiff refusing to amend or plead over, the appellee had judgment upon the demurrer.

The two paragraphs are substantially the same. Both seek to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant.

The substance of the facts alleged is that, the defendant’s railroad track runs through the city of Columbus, upon and along Jackson street, running north and south across Ninth street, both of which are public streets in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Crawfordsville v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. McGahan v. Indianapolis Natural Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. PerrigueyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Kistner v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Nickey v. SteuderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API