Legal Opinion

City of Crawfordsville v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8847PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Erom the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

— The material facts stated as the cause of action are these: Appellant is a municipal corporation j one of its streets, called College street, runs up to the brink of an excavation twenty-five feet in depth; on each side of this ex*309cavation College street is.graded and gravelled, á'nd is open for travel and is travelled,to a point within a yard of the steep banks of the cut;’that appellant has not constructed abridge over the excavation, nor in any way guarded or protected it, but has negligently suffered it to remain ojten and unguarded; that on the night of the 6th day of March, 1880,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ring v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. City of Logansport v. DickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Hunt v. Town of PownalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Anderson v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Town of Albion v. HetrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API