Legal Opinion
R.A. Putnam & Associates, Inc. v. City of Mendota Heights
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 11, 1994No. C2-93-1702PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
The district court ordered appellant The City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota (city), to rezone property, grant a conditional use permit, and approve a sketch plan for the site. The city’s motion for an amended judgment or a new trial was denied. We reverse.
FACTS
In approximately 1957, the property in question was zoned low-density residential (R-l). In 1985, the city approved an amendment to its Comprehensive Plan intended to redesignate the property High-Density Residential-Planned Unit Development (HR-PUD). The Metropolitan Council rejected the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Rochester Ass'n of Neighborhoods v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Hurrle v. County of Sherburne Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC. v. City of Saint PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Application of MerrittCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.