Legal Opinion
CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC. v. City of Saint Paul
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 16, 2009No. Civil 06-3304 (DWF/AJB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (“Clear Channel”) commenced this action against the City of Saint Paul (the “City”) after the City passed a zoning ordinance that banned all extensions on billboards in St. Paul. This matter came before the Court on May 8, 2009, pursuant to Clear Channel’s motion for partial summary judgment and the City’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Clear Channel’s motion and denies the City’s motion.
BACKGROUND
The City is a home rule charter municipality…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aery v. Unknown Actors in the Employ of Beltrami County JailDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- Event Sales, Inc. v. TJX Companies, Inc. TheDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- Kasso v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Laughlin v. StuartDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Martinez-Vivanco v. WardenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.