Legal Opinion
United States v. One Parcel of Property
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 25, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-76-JLLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
The United States of America filed a complaint for forfeiture in rem under § 881(a)(7) 1 against the defendant, one parcel of property located at 200 Pennsylvania Avenue. 2 (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 1.) Before this Court is the United States’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that probable cause exists under the forfeiture laws and that the claimant, owner of the defendant property, is collaterally estopped from contesting the probable cause. (D.I. 17, 18.)
The claimant owns the defendant property and challenges its forfeiture. (D.I. 1…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Premises Known as RR 1, Box 224, Dalton, Scott Township & North Abington Township, Lackawanna County, PACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HopkinsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- In re $5,662 United States CurrencySuperior Court of Delaware · 1998
- No. 93-7265Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. 47 Mm CannonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000