Legal Opinion

United States v. 47 Mm Cannon

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 4, 2000No. CA-99-01874-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CACHE RIS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED.

I. Background

On March 20, 1996, David Boles was convicted of a felony in a Virginia commonwealth court. On August 12, 1999, the •Defendants — various firearms and ammunition — -were seized from this possession. On September 29, 1999, Boles pled guilty to possessing the Defendant firearms and ammunition after being convicted of a felony. This is a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). 1

The Government now…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API