Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Abraham
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 27, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-2009(RMU)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The defendants alternatively move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The plaintiffs, who bring this suit as a class action, 1 also move for summary judgment. The plaintiffs include: Consolidated Edison of New York, Long Island Lighting Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Spencer AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003