Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Abraham
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 20, 2002No. 02-1134PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
On summary judgment, the . United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) lawfully applied its 1992 eligibility rule for crude oil overcharge refunds. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and eight other claimants for crude oil overcharge refunds (collectively, Con Edison) challenge the district court’s award to the Huntsman Corporation. Because the trial court correctly applied the rules for overcharge refunds, this court affirms.
I
Huntsman, formerly El Paso Products Company, filed a claim for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In Re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. AbrahamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012