Legal Opinion

Hedges v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1963No. 36304PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The plaintiff wife, while a passenger on one of the defendant’s trains and walking near the forward door of the dining car, was thrown to the floor by a violent jerk or jolt which occurred when an axle journal broke, causing a portion of the undercarriage to drop into contact with the railroad ties. In this action, she recovered damages for personal injuries which she suffered as a result of this fall.

It is the position of the defendant that its evidence showed that it was free of negligence as a matter of law. This evidence was that it was the practice of the company to comply with the rules…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walters v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Firebaugh v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Williams v. Stokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. American Cotton Oil Co. v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Bradley v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tinder v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Hedges v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Washington Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API